The past month has been interesting, and not necessarily in a positive way.

A topic that has dominated discussions professionally and socially, for me at least, has been the increased desire of investors to invest a meaningful portion of their assets offshore. This follows a growing trend where assets under our care are steadily tilting towards hard currency global solutions as time wears on.

The reasons for this vary. The main theme recently has been a desire to hedge oneself from SA political & systematic risk.

When you look back to even a month ago, the risk of a political fallout has increased. Although we don’t think it is highly likely that we will see the country imploding in the next couple of weeks, the risk, in fact, is non-zero and thus does requires our dedicated attention.

In spite of this, we still believe that the most important reason to invest overseas should not be because of a state of nervousness, but rather due to portfolio diversification strategy. It is something we tout quite often as being fundamental to a successful investment strategy.

You may now ask if doing the right thing for the wrong reasons remains the right thing. I would say, ‘In a way, yes’.

The political risk that South Africans believe they face, correctly or otherwise, is that we are at a crossroad where either it all breaks down, or not. The stakes are high. The higher the stakes, the more harrowing the experience of having to live through the events as and when they occur. This is compounded by the fact that what a person stands to lose is the ability to call South Africa home, which is indeed a very emotional consideration. It is therefore very difficult to completely disregard these emotions when making investment decisions.

The problem with making decisions emotionally, is that it is always reactive. In order for your investment strategy to be successful, it is of utmost importance to remain proactive. Not in the sense of trying to predict the future at all, but rather ensuring that your asset & liability profile, remain aligned with a suitable strategy after considering the risks involved in the various options available.

We support the idea of having a healthy portion of your assets invested outside of the country, even if your liabilities are in Rand. By comparison, SA is a small country, and although there are a few very good companies with which one can invest, the universe remains small. There are many sectors that remain underrepresented on the JSE that can only be accessed in a global portfolio. That doesn’t even touch on the multitude of excellent investment companies and opportunities available beyond our borders.

We strongly believe that increasing the geographic breadth of your asset risk exposure is a wise move, all things considered. Doing so enables you to remove your exposure to SA systematic risk, though a few additional issues still need to be considered. While matching your assets and liabilities across different currencies are among the important considerations, ensuring that you have adequate diversification across asset classes should remain your primary consideration. Investing across multiple jurisdictions can also create additional considerations in the event of your death. However, with proper consultation and planning, these issues can be navigated.

The situation we find ourselves in at the moment is rather unique, and requires level headed thinking. Disentangling yourself from SA can be an expensive exercise, and needs to be considered in broader context – SA is not the only country that has risks and challenges, political or otherwise.

Looking at the big picture we recognize the influence of political risk. By its very nature, political risk is almost entirely unpredictable, and difficult to factor into our process. What we can say again, is that diversifying your assets is a good idea, as long as you have a proper plan in place and have considered the implications of selling SA assets and investing offshore.

As we bear witness to a great exodus of cash, I think we all hope that things work out for us; the question we should ask ourselves is not “Am I hedged against the apocalypse?” but rather to look at your balance sheet and ask, “Can this be improved?”.

Kind regards,

Stefan Keeve










All illustrations, forecasts, information and opinions provided are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. We endeavor to provide accurate and timely information but we make no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the correctness, accuracy or completeness of the illustrations, forecasts, information or opinions. No party should act upon such information or opinion without obtaining the appropriate professional and specialised financial, legal and tax advice based upon a thorough examination of a particular situation. Investors should at all times remain aware of the risks involved in the buying or selling of any financial product, and hereby acknowledges the inherent risk associated with the selected investments and that there are no guarantees (Paragraph 6(2)(f) of BN92).
Seed Investment Consultants will not be held liable for any direct or consequential loss or damage suffered by any party as a result of that party acting on or failing to act on the basis of information or opinion provided by or omitted from this document. The Manager retains full legal responsibility for any third-party named portfolio (Paragraph 6(1)(g) of BN92).
Prescient Management Company and the Trustee are registered and approved under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act (No.45 of 2002). Collective Investment Schemes in Securities (CIS) should be considered as medium to long-term investments. The value of financial products can increase as well as decrease over time depending on the value of the underlying securities and market conditions and past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance (no guarantee is provided as to the values of any financial product mentioned in this document). The collective investment scheme may borrow up to 10% of the market value of the portfolio to bridge insufficient liquidity. A schedule of fees, charges and maximum commissions is available on request from the Manager. There is no guarantee in respect of capital or returns in a portfolio. A CIS may be closed to new investors in order for it to be managed more efficiently in accordance with its mandate. CIS prices are calculated on a net asset basis, which is the total value of all the assets in the portfolio including any income accruals and less any permissible deductions (brokerage, STT, VAT, auditor’s fees, bank charges, trustee and custodian fees and the annual management fee) from the portfolio divided by the number of participatory interests (units) in issue. Forward pricing is used. In the event that specific collective investment schemes in securities (unit trusts) are mentioned please refer to the relevant Minimum Disclosure Document in order to obtain all the necessary information in regard to that unit trust.
This document may not be amended, reproduced, distributed or published without the prior consent of Seed Investment Consultants. The laws of the Republic of South Africa shall govern any claim relating to or arising from the contents of this document. Seed Investment Consultants is an authorised financial services provider in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (Act No. 37 of 2002).
Performance has been calculated using net NAV to NAV numbers with income reinvested. Full performance calculations are available from the manager on request.
DEFINITIONS (where applicable)
Annualised Return:       Annualised return shows longer term performance rescaled to a 1 year period. Annualised return is the average return per year over the period. Actual annual figures are available to the investor on request.
Highest and Lowest:     The highest and lowest returns, since launch, for any rolling 1 year period have been shown.
Annual Return:
Back to articles